The sentencing judge found, accurately in my view, that the vigilante violence skilled by Mr. Suter could possibly be thought-about — to a restricted extent — when crafting an appropriate sentence. This error also contributed to the 26-month custodial sentence it imposed. The Court of Appeal of Alberta found that the sentencing choose made a quantity of errors in his choice, and that these errors in combination resulted in an unfit sentence. At the sentencing listening to, defence counsel sought a non-custodial sentence — both a fantastic or a fine and probation. Crown counsel, however, sought the imposition of a …